
I’ve been on Twitter now for about a year and spent enough time watching the referral traffic to my blog posts to start to nail down some general rules of thumb on how much traffic you can expect from the micro-blogging phenom.
In general, I’ve found that I get about 6 (yes, 6) unique visitors within an hour of posting a short, catchy descriptor along with my URL.
Or: “Phew, just finished this post - Why Newspapers are Failing Online
www.6ek2z.th8.us”
That’s 6 unique visitors from a single post on my Twitter feed and I have 1,500 followers right now and have had over 1,000 for about 6 months.
So, I would say a good rule of thumb would be 1,000 followers = 6 unique visitors. I have also found that the same rule can apply for re-tweets (when one of my followers, reposts the URL on their own Twitter feed).
So 1,000 followers = 6 unique visitors + 6 more for every Re-Tweet. It just so happens that a quick look at my most active followers, shows that most have around the same number of followers as me, so this Re-Tweet factor makes sense. This multiplier effect can actually be pretty significant if you start with 6 and then get 40 Re-Tweets that’s 6 + (6 x 40) = 246 unique visitors. Not bad, when you consider that it takes about 15 seconds to compose the twitter post and hit submit.
An interesting thing that I also noticed over time is that posts that are directly related to Twitter on average get about 10 unique visitors, versus the usual 6.
For example, this post on my Twitter feed - “My top ten tweeters not on Twitter, what do you think? http://reque.st/1687″ - referred 10 unique visitors to my blog. I haven’t written too much on Twitter, so this one is still in the “strong hunch” phase.
These numbers might sound a little depressing, I’m sure you spent a lot of time building a great Twitter profile in the hopes (at least in part) that it might end up driving some nice traffic to your site. 6 for every 1,000 followers doesn’t sound like much, but it actually is a lot.
As I mentioned, drafting a submitting post on your Twitter feed takes about 15 seconds. Those 6 visitors take a micro-second to get. Compare this to the hours it takes to work on the perfect Digg-bait post, only to see it shrivel and die on the general submission page and zero traffic back to your site.
With the way follows are set up on Twitter those 6 visitors are also the types of people who are genuinely interested in your blog post and for me at least many of my followers are fellow bloggers. So if one of those 6 write a post on their own site, that’s a HUGE pay-off for very little time investment.
And finally, remember the rule of 6 is per one thousand followers, so if you have 10,000 followers, plus 100 Re-Tweets that’s a good bit of of highly targeted traffic for doing very little. I would also assume that the 6 per thousand rule would also increase as you become more influential on Twitter and followers in that range.
Now you can imagine the nice bit of traffic Top Twitter users like Robert Scoble are generating for their posts.
But, hey this is just my rule of thumb based on a year of observing traffic referral behavior. I haven’t had the time to do any actually data analysis, so if these numbers seem way off I would stand to be corrected.
What have your observations been? Do you have any Twitter traffic rules-of-thumb?
Oh, and please follow me on Twitter if you’re interested in this type of information, I would love to get to that 10,000 mark someday!
